KL Rahul was dismissed on 26 runs on day one of the first Test ... with some suggesting that more replays could have been reviewed. However, Mitchell Starc, the Australian pacer, disagreed, describing the dismissal as a “regulation wicket” and ...

The on-field umpire Richard Kettleborough did not give it out, and it was then that Australia took the review. The third umpire Richard Illingworth overturned the decision after seeing a spike on snicko. However, the spike could have also come because of the bat hitting the pad at the same time.

Australia pacer Mitchell Starc has brushed off the DRS controversy from Day 1 as a regulation wicket. On Friday, KL Rahul's wicket created furore amongst cricket fans.

Australia’s senior pacer Mitchell Starc on Friday played down the chatter around India batter KL Rahul’s contentious caught behind dismissal on the first day of the opening Test here, saying it was a “regulation wicket”.

When the ball started to get a little bit softer towards the back end of that Indian innings, it probably didn't do as much. There was still enough there, but it didn't do as much as the brand-new hardball.

Mitchell Starc downplays controversy over KL Rahul's dismissal, confident in Australia's bowling performance against India in Test match.

Mitchell Starc felt that KL Rahul's wicket as a regulation and saw nothing wrong with his dismissal on Day 1 of the first Test in Perth.