Donald Trump couldn’t help but gloat Tuesday that he’d successfully bullied MarkZuckerberg into making ... his buddy “ZUCKERBUCKS” in a July post on Truth Social, promising to “pursue ...
In the weeks leading up to MarkZuckerberg’s sweeping changes to Meta ... quick to call out the tech mogul on social media. In a post on X Sunday night, the California governor posted an ...
Zuckerberg himself acknowledged the move to ... Once accepted, they can suggest a note on any post they argue is incorrect or needs more context. Notes that receive enough backing from ...
There was a time when Mark Zuckerberg didn’t regard mainstream media as the enemy. He even allowed me, a card-carrying legacy media person, into his home. In April 2018, I ventured there to hear his plans to do the right thing.
The New York Times reports that the Meta CEO signaled to Stephen Miller that he wouldn't obstruct Trump’s agenda during a December meeting, where he also blamed the company’s progressive culture on his “close friend” Sheryl Sandberg.
Mark Zuckerberg has been busy. Last week, he announced his future plans for Meta, which included halting all independent fact-checking efforts and relaxing moderation of anti-LGBTQ+ hate speech. Through the days that followed,
Readers discuss Mark Zuckerberg’s decisions to end fact-checking on social media, DEI program in Meta. Regarding the Jan. 8 front-page article “ Meta ends fact checks as it readies for Trump era ”:
On Joe Rogan’s podcast, Zuckerberg made it clear he was ready to do business: In his peculiar black T-shirt and gold chain — like a balky child of the suburbs straining for some nebulous urban cred — he railed against the Biden administration and affirmed,
Zuckerberg claimed to be “excited” by “the opportunity to restore free expression,” but few who commented on his speech felt similarly thrilled. Those on the left wrote him off as a sellout. Those on the right wondered where Zuckerberg’s principles were during the past four years of judicial persecution and censorship.