The New York Times reports that the Meta CEO signaled to Stephen Miller that he wouldn't obstruct Trump’s agenda during a December meeting, where he also blamed the company’s progressive culture on his “close friend” Sheryl Sandberg.
There was a time when Mark Zuckerberg didn’t regard mainstream media as the enemy. He even allowed me, a card-carrying legacy media person, into his home. In April 2018, I ventured there to hear his plans to do the right thing.
Readers discuss Mark Zuckerberg’s decisions to end fact-checking on social media, DEI program in Meta. Regarding the Jan. 8 front-page article “ Meta ends fact checks as it readies for Trump era ”:
Mark Zuckerberg has been busy. Last week, he announced his future plans for Meta, which included halting all independent fact-checking efforts and relaxing moderation of anti-LGBTQ+ hate speech. Through the days that followed,
On Joe Rogan’s podcast, Zuckerberg made it clear he was ready to do business: In his peculiar black T-shirt and gold chain — like a balky child of the suburbs straining for some nebulous urban cred — he railed against the Biden administration and affirmed,
Zuckerberg claimed to be “excited” by “the opportunity to restore free expression,” but few who commented on his speech felt similarly thrilled. Those on the left wrote him off as a sellout. Those on the right wondered where Zuckerberg’s principles were during the past four years of judicial persecution and censorship.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has taken a lot of heat since he announced last week that he is pulling his company out of the fact-checking business and curtailing content moderation on its platforms. The criticism is understandable, given the uncertainty over how Meta’s new rules will handle misinformation and otherwise harmful material.
In the weeks leading up to MarkZuckerberg’s sweeping changes to Meta ... quick to call out the tech mogul on social media. In a post on X Sunday night, the California governor posted an ...