A federal judge denied Sean "Diddy" Combs bail on Wednesday, Nov. 27. The decision came in a Wednesday ruling by federal judge Arun Subramanian, after Combs appeared in court on Friday, Nov. 22, for a third bail hearing, citing him as a considerable risk to community safety.

Diddy’s third attempt to get bail has failed, despite him offering to pay a $50 million bond. The judge said there is a serious risk of witness tampering if Diddy is allowed to await trial on charges

Sean "Diddy" Combs has been denied bail for a third time by a judge who claims he poses a serious risk of "witness tampering."

Prosecutors in the ongoing case against Sean “Diddy” Combs are citing his alleged “witness tampering” behind bars, “threatening” and punching his personal staff and more among the reasons to deny him bail.

The motion came ahead of an upcoming decision on whether Diddy can be granted a $50 million bail and released on house arrest. Prosecutors are claiming Diddy will only continue tampering with witnesses from out of prison.

The detained rapper-mogul allegedly used unauthorized apps and other inmates' phone codes as he attempted to tamper with a witness from behind bars.

Sean "Diddy" Combs will remain incarcerated ahead of his May 2025 trial, Judge Arun Subramanian ruled on Wednesday. The Southern District of New York judge's written ruling cited the rapper's potential witness tampering and evident violations of jail regulations as his reasons for denying bail,

Sean 'Diddy' Combs remains in custody after a federal judge denied his $50M bail request due to fears of witness tampering and safety risks. The ruling follows a history of alleged violent behavior, unauthorized communications,

Evidence found in Sean "Diddy" Combs' jail cell suggests he has influenced a witness and is trying to blackmail others, prosecutors claim.

U.S. district judge Arun Subramanian denied Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’s third attempt at bail Wednesday. The disgraced music mogul will remain in custody until his trial starts on May 5. “The court finds that the government has shown by clear and convincing evidence that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of the community,